The ballot referendum had been signed by more than 3,500 people, exceeding the minimum requirement to let voters decide on it. But the City Council suggested that the language was possibly unconstitutional, so the voters shouldn't consider it. In a press release, the Peace Planters said some members of the Council weren't convinced that the voters should have authority of the quasi-municipal Planned Industrial Expansion Authority, which issued bonds to pay for the Botts Road plant. (If you want to give yourself a migraine, read this February Pitch story about who actually owns the plant.)
Undaunted, the Peace Planters' statement says they'll get back to life as usual: gathering signatures on a fresh ballot initiative and hoping to push it through the City Council for the November ballot.
"Since the Council did a lot of work on wording an ordinance they thought would pass legal muster, we expect to get new wording approved by the City Attorney before printing up new petitions. The drive should start shortly," the statement said.